Comments on Acts 12 v1-2 Herod Agrippa I, the grandson of Herod the Great, persecutes the Christians and has James, brother of John Beloved, executed. It is possible that with James' execution Paul is made an apostle, but no replacement is ever explicitly identified. v3-11 When Herod sees that his persecution of the Christians pleases the Jews over whom he rules he continues on in the campaign by taking Peter, the leader of the Christians. The Church prays for Peter without ceasing, and he is miraculously delivered. So miraculously that Peter himself has a hard time believing it. v3 "the days of unleavened bread", i.e., the Feast of Passover. v4 "Easter", the KJV takes considerable liberty in translating the Greek "pascha" to "Easter", which is elsewhere translated "Passover". All modern translations render this "Passover". v9 The experience is so surreal to Peter he thinks he is dreaming it all, especially since the angel woke him from sleep to release him. It isn't until he is well outside the prison the reality of the situation sinks in to him. v10 The text doesn't inform us if the "ward", or guards, are awake or asleep. The general context suggests it was at night, as Peter himself was awaken from sleep in v. 7. One would assume the guards were asleep as well as there is little point in keeping awake to watch someone bound in chains and behind locked doors. v12-17 After he has had some time to think, Peter decides to go where he is certain people will be gathered. Upon arrival a woman goes to the gate and is so shocked she doesn't even let Peter in, instead she runs and tells the others. They don't believe her though, and tell her she is crazy. When she adamantly insists it is true, they conclude it must be Peter's spirit. But when Peter keeps knocking, they go and find it really is him in the flesh. He quiets their astonishment and relates what happened, and then leaves, presumably for a safe place to hide out for a while. v15-16 Their reaction to Peter's miraculous release seems kind of odd given their apparently devout praying in his behalf in v. 5. One would assume they were not expecting anything quite so dramatic or miraculous. Or, were so given over to the idea of Peter's execution that their prayers were more for Peter's consolation than for some sort of delivery. v20-23 The people of Tyre and Sidon anger Herod Agrippa I over some matter, so they enlist the aid of an insider and resort to ingratiating themselves by calling Herod a god. Herod enjoys it and apparently is filled with pride. However, an angel of the Lord smites Herod and he dies. v23 "because he gave not God the glory", political rulers whom the Lord places where He pleases anger Him when they boast in their own strength and wisdom, cp. Isa. 10:5-15. "and he was eaten of worms, and gave up the ghost", while the word order in English means "this...then that" it is not so in Greek. Word order in Greek sentences is meaningless. Thus, it is plain that he gives up the ghost first, and then is eaten by worms. The "eaten by worms" statement is a paraphrase of Isa. 14:11, thus Luke is comparing Herod's demise with the overthrow of the ancient king of Babylon castigated in Isa. 14. Copyright © 2002 by S. Kurt Neumiller . All rights reserved. No part of this text may be reproduced in any form or by any means for commercial gain without the express written consent of the author. Digital or printed copies may be freely made and distributed for personal and public non-commercial use.